@@bdickerson7898 It's not a joke. There was at least 3 Pauls. People do die in car accidents, it's not so outlandish to consider and that was the rumor. The original had a side to side head bobble and was shorter than John Lennon, about the same height as George. Then there was the arrest in Japan where Paul #3 or #2 spent 9 days in jail for using a passport as an imposter. Paul #1's fingerprints were on file and they didn't match the imposter's. The British MI6 had to get involved to get him out. Anyhow, look at the post 1967 videos. The side to side head bobble is gone. And he's taller than John Lennon. There's no doubt in my mind there was at least 3 if not 4 Paul and maybe 2 John Lennons but I'm still on the fence. His nose had an odd shape to it in later years.
I don’t know why people still have a hard time believing that lookalikes are used to temporarily or permanently replace high profile public figures. Saddam Hussein famously had three lookalikes in rotation. And it’s been officially confirmed that a lookalike was used to replace Britney Spears on at least one occasion, and it was a meet and greet where fans get to see the star up close, and yet only a few sharp-eyed fans noticed that it wasn’t her.
Saddam Hussein may have had doubles for a whole host of reasons including the fact that he was in the gun sights of a host of actors. Britney Spears may have slighted one of her fanatical fans, so rather than admit she was capable of such an act, they deny it was her. As far as Paul goes, there was no reason to replace this kid from a boy band in 1966. The Beatles were not very important. The mistake PID makes is, they believe the hype of the Beatles. They want to claim they are so enlightened, but they believe all the propaganda about how significant this group was. They weren't. In 1966 the Beatles were important to teenage girls in the West and Japan. The rest of the world was consumed with the Cold War, Vietnam, Civil Rights, poverty, etc. The Warsaw Pact, China, India and the vast majority of the world didn't know or care about these individuals from the UK.
@@IndependentAnalyst Wow! That's a bizarre understanding of how huge an impact The Beatles had on the whole world. Yes, horrible wars going on then, as now, all based on lies, but young people and teenagers in particular world-wide, were consumed with Beatlemania. It's tragic that Paul died in 1966--or was assassinated.
@@pjmurphy920 I don't know what you think is bizarre. "young people and teenagers in particular world-wide" Actually no. As I pointed out, "The Warsaw Pact, China, India and the vast majority of the world didn't know or care about these individuals from the UK." Rock music was considered the outgrowth of Western capitalist decadence. The idea that Red Guards in China, Komsomol in Russia, or youth in Islamic republics knew or cared about the Beatles is ridiculous. They barely toured outside the English speaking world. If you were over the age of 20 in 64 you had little interest in the Beatles. Most parents hated them. There were even songs about it, see Allen Shermans' "Pop Hates the Beatles." McCartney could have died in 66 (he didn't) and believe it or not, the world would have kept turning. He was just not at all important.
People are lied to all of their lives and I knew Paul was replaced when I lived in Germany in the mid to late 60's. I was mad for a long time and now I just live with it. Most people loved the Beatles so they can't accept Paul being replaced. When Governments get involved weird and corrupt things happen. Normal people are so deep in the hole, we'll never be told the truth. Believe what makes you feel good. I can be right and I can be wrong. That's life.
Paul is one of two living Beatles. The Beatles music changed drastically in 66 bordering on psychedelic. It wasn't until the 70s that they got back to basic. Their looks changed in 66, they looked rough and totally unlike their former clean shaven selves.
Paul last appearance was in Seattle 1966. He was never seen alive again after that show. The first replacement played at candlestick park. Paul died close to September 11, 1966. He was 22 years old. This video was made for fun. The subject of PID, is a horrible one and not funny at all. The host is correct when he says Paul drove the girls wild, and he did lead the band. Faul did not drive the chicks the same way. One was hot, one was not
That would be my assessment as well. Paul #2 was taller than George and didn't have the same side to side head bobble. And today I'm pretty sure it's Paul #3 if not #4. It was not out of the ordinary for a celeb to die but people want to believe what they're told by mass media. Either he died because of an accident or maybe he didn't want to participate in the promotion of the drug culture as so many of those bands who oh by the way were related to government personnel and never oh by the way drafted into the Vietnam war, and never arrested for drug possession. I wonder if they were mules of the day, or distributors.
I think the personality thing is one of the biggest clues. James Paul was so witty and charming. Came across as genuine and kind. The later Paul seems absurdly cocky, and unpleasant.
It is amazing that they were able to find s replacement as handsome as Paul McCartney, as left handed as him, who could also sing with a multi-octave voice that scored top ten hits over the next four decades, and the guy they found was able to play brilliant bass guitar, credible lead guitar, as well as acoustic guitar and piano. Well Done Faul!!
I know right lol. I have a joke I make that if Paul really did die in 1966 and Faul gave us all the other music, than that’s an amazing tale in and of itself and he should be praised haha. Instead of taking a dead man’s name
Stephen, William looked little like Paul, is right handed, is classically trained in both voice and instrument and is not as good a bass player as Paul.
If that’s the case then they would’ve had a exact lookalike for ringo when he was sick during a tour in 1964 for a bit. Hell, what if all the Beatles were sick and they were all replaced???
Well we know that the world is filled with most people living inside the Box unaware that there's even windows. I took 4 years off and on looking at hundreds of different photographs and videotape and then seeing things that had been synced and it wasn't sent correctly to make us believe that William Campbell AKA Billy Shears the guy that's on the stage in this video has taken the place of James Paul McCartney. But believe me it took me a long time to be able to wrap my head around that this could possibly have happened, and I couldn't see the difference 100% and if that wasn't going to be 100% that I would be still wondering. Or probably paying attention at all like I did for the first 50 years of my life. But then I would run across pictures and I'd kind of pick it up and run with it again and then one day I saw the difference. And then I tested myself off and on for quite some time by looking at pictures to see if I could see the difference between the two. And what I found that convinced me was there was an innocence, proper mannerisms from James Paul McCartney the original. And the type of uncouth not raise perhaps in a house where manners were expected kind of rough around the edges I saw William Campbell. And since that day like 5 years ago I can see the difference instantly. And then when he did that interview with David Letterman find it on RUclips they talk about it the conspiracy and where did dark brown eyes disappear on James Hall McCartney and become kind of Hazel Green? Eye color doesn't change some people say where's contacts I don't think so because what would explain the very slender nose? Because men's noses have a tendency to get a little broader with age and not slender with age. But everybody to himself it does take time and maybe an interest in seeing if there was anything truth 🕊️🇺🇲🕊️off as the biggest hoax on the entire planet.
Excellent find a footage 👍 have you done it Yesterday comparison? I'm I'm finding it harder to find the original song I think that the conspirators have remastered a lot of their music prior William Campbell which really ticks me off. I remember there was a video out there and it was showing the difference between the two singing Yesterday , James Paul McCartney sang in H pitch. William Campbell could only sing that in a G pitch. And when he was in the band wings and saying yesterday it was horrible. And they tried to kind of cover it up cuz I'm so horrible he made some excuse because he left off the ending. And being from that generation we don't realize how we have memorized every note of a song until somebody screws it up. Put a blindfold on us put our generations music out there and where to tell you who is singing that song! Enjoy your channel thumbs up 👍🕊️🇺🇲 Kathleen the Pacific Northwest 🌲
So what happened here was: the gear they were using (mainly the microphones) were very dodgy, so all through that show John/George/Paul had to fix up the mics. It even got to the point where the platform that ringos drums were on wasnt rotating (the show was meant to end with the drums rotating because of the rotating platform), so either you're high as hell or you believe all that stuff about him dying.
Have you even been in a room with a guitar? The only people who buy into the whole looking at his fretboard thing have obviously never played an instrument (to a professional level). Paul was playing the same 20 songs for about 2.5 years every single day and by the end of the 65 tour It was muscle memory. Those songs have very simple bass parts in comparison to what he was doing later that year and beyond. You can see that muscle memory in the get back docu when they go through old numbers. In this clip you can see all 3 of the other Beatles look at their (far less complex to sing with) instruments. Were they all replaced then??
@martingodinez3771 he looks at it all the time. In an old video, I watched them perform, "Please, please me". Paul never looks at his guitar, & that's some excellent playing.
@@TheEvbox Glad someone else said it. I look at my hands when I am playing really difficult things I am learning, while I DONT when the muscle memory is baked in. I play: Guitar Bass Stand up bass Pipe Organ Drums Arabic Percussion I'm also a classically trained composer and conductor. Looking at one's fingers for a difficult passage is not a crime.
Many know they switched Paul. But few people understand why. The reason is the Beatles was a carefully designed operation. It was a centerpiece of the youth revolution. That's why the powers behind didn't want to risk ruining their project. It is also why they had a replacement ready in case one was needed. That was always a part of the plan. The whole Beatle mania thing was planned and manufactured. No, they didn't write those songs. They were written by a group of professionals, carefully picked by the system. And no, they also didn't sell as many records as they tell you. The key thing is that you believe they did. The 'girls screaming' were often just a track of sound added in post production. They would also hire actors to play hardcore fans for concerts to create their mania. The public would then imitate what they saw, thinking it was real. The point of the whole pop/rock project was to shape society. By altering culture the powers behind get to alter people's values and behavior. So in the end it's about power and control. That, in short, is why they implemented a fake Paul instead of simply replacing the bass player in the open.
Paul was never the Beatles "frontman" - No one was, but if their was one, it would have been John Lennon who was the leader of the group --Not even their producer George Martin could decide who'd be the frontman, so Martin, drawing upon his experience recording British comedy groups essentially invented the Rock Band, whereas before the Beatles there was only Elvis, or Little Richard, Buddy Holly Jerry Lee, etc. backed by a back up band of often changing unobtrusive musicians whom the public rarely even knew their names..
Paul has the charming look 🥰 my crush. Faul is serious type. This is my first time to see this. Meaning Faul was officially a sub to Paul. Obviously he cant copy that Natural head shaking and footwork and dancing. Its so sad that the real paul was not given tribute. I hope the music industry or maybe somone who knows the truth will tell us one day.
You clearly haven't seen many interviews with Paul post 1966 if you don't see the funny, charming Paul that has always been, and still is. But of course there are more serious interviews as bad things happen in our lives as time passes. Also, people are often a bit more thoughtful and serious as they grow older. Look at all of them. They were all joking around in all their interviews in the beginning, but got more serious in the later Beatles years, so why is it ok for John, George and Ringo to get more serious and not Paul? You only think Paul can't shake his head because this guy tells you that he is trying (it's a joke video by the way). Maybe he's just not doing it here. Maybe he stopped doing it altogether, Who knows? If that's the only evidence you have to cling to, then maybe you should stop and have a think. There are endless videos showing evidence of Paul being the same before and after 1966. Same teeth, same eyes, same voice, same vocal range and so on. Here's are a couple for you: ruclips.net/video/8_LiyvEErMc/видео.html ruclips.net/video/XeB7czisBlQ/видео.html Peace out.
This is great. I think Faul played at Candlestick Park Aug 28 1966 and also did the press conference in LA right after. I had a theory that something happened in 1964 to Paul, thus the song When I'm 64. New sub here.
Paul McCartney is a fictitious name, otherwise the replacement/double for the Swain would have ended the ruse when he ended the Beatles. Nobody could otherwise live with something that wasn't just a stage name near sixty years. He has no problem running away with the name that never belonged to the original Swain either. As to when and why they replaced the Swain, nobody but Ringo Star (another fictitious character) could tell you. But he merely screws with Beatle Bill and never comes clean.
@@SpaceGhost67 Actually, it's worse than that. When these musicians sign their first contract, they are usually young, older adolescents or young adults in their early 20s. They don't usually hire a lawyer as they are just so thrilled to have a music contract. So, what the music contract says is the record company can use their name and their likeness in perpetuity. That last word means forever. Then, when they get famous, they decide they want to go in a different direction, they find out they should have hired a lawyer with the first contract. So, when Paul died or left, the Record company had the rights to his looks and his name, in perpetuity. Billy Shepard, the Faul guy, or whoever he is walked right in a took the name since Paul was already famous and Paul's likeness, and here you go. The same thing happened to Prince and that's why he changed his name to a symbol. Prince even talked about this in interviews before he died and tells all about how it works. Also, the same thing happened to Dave Chappelle, the comedian, and he made a video telling all about it as well. I would think both these videos may still be up on YT. It happens all the time to these young singers who become famous, then they find out they have signed a contract that requires dancing with the devil, and they can't get out of it and if they do, it may cost them their lives. Bob Dillon talked about his contract with the devil with Bill Bradley in an interview still on YT. Others have talked about it too. It's frequently called the Faustian bargain or "Selling your soul" so to speak. It is the real Hotel California. So, they do what they're told even if it's taking on the religion of those running the business, and as you can see from how they dress and sing is a very dark religion.
Don't see why all these true believers can't conceive of their heroes using doubles.They used doubles to divert fans at some of their shows so they could get to the gig & not get killed.Anyone notice how quickly their management replaced Ringo with Jimmy Nichols for a European tour?Brian Epstein was not going to let anything or anyone (even a dead Beatle)stop that money train.I'm certain by 65' or 66" they figured they could almost throw anyone up on that stage & Billy is so obviously taller & stouter but they found out it worked & if bio Paul really bit it do you think the rest of them including all the hangers on that Lennon despised were going to say goodbye to all that moola?F#*k no!It's all a big fantasy the fans have of the happy go lucky heroes skipping along in total harmony.Which in reality ended in Billie suing the other 3 because it was really about money.That's the fuel for the engine that makes bands or any enterprise run.Remember John sang"The Dream Is Over".WAKE UP FAB FANS!
Beatles were never my heros but I find the theory somewhat intriguing , some Ppl.seem to want the cute cherub face looking lad back,Paul was no angel though,as soon as a contract is signed=show/business.I see changes in appaearance,but to me it looks like drugs'fame'touring,exploring,experminenting,experiences in general made them all change more or less.They could'nt look like quadruplets forever,the group split a few yrs later anyw.Plus much more but some PID'ers get so mad I decided to try & Let it be.
@@rebeccajelenawang4306 Yea but you don't grow 4 inches in one year at age 22. And the signature side to side head bobble was gone by 1967 when all the lyrics were drug and occult references. Definitely a part of Tavistock.
@@warntheidiotmasses7114 yea..I agree... don't know about Tavistock though....are they nefarious also..crikey..this whole thing is so freakin dark..a real shame, and a sham.!😤🤷
@@sanctifyme4543 Yea government agencies ordered billions of doses of LSD from one of the big harma companies. Control the masses by drugging them while your own sect becomes doctors, lawyers, bankers and law makers.
@@sanctifyme4543 The LOVE will heal everything. We just have to find it. Imbue ourselves in it. And spread it all around. ❤️ God has His hand in everything, and everything is meant to lead to love in the end. If it hasn't, it just means that it isn't the end yet. It is promised that the best is yet to come. 💖
Wow you've done it - this is smoking gun footage brilliant stuff - he couldn't lead or shake his head while singing it was just a clumsy nod - James Paul McCartney had it perfectly synchronized - here we have his stand in - and yes he looks like today's Faul its him alright - this all means Faul was a double before 66 - James Paul was sick - head cold sick or dying sick ?
Still shocked on how people think faul is real, like are you kidding me?! Out of all the Beatles I’d think John would be the one who got a replacement due to how much he changed in the 60s
@@olskzeri1476 There was a DNA sample taken when Faul visited Japan with his weed stuff. Police took his fingerprints which didn´t match to the Paul´s fingerprints taken in Germany.
@@uy7munir Yes of course. You and your little minority are the clever ones (ignoring every bit of evidence that Paul is Paul), while the rest of the world is ignorant. If that feeling makes you happy, then bless your little heart. In the meantime, the rest of us can enjoy McCartney 1942 - present day.
The footage is ALL Paul. So what if he looked unsure in the latter footage. No artist is 100% on, all the bluudy time, mate...There is the good with the bad. For you to say that "Faul" took over is pure stupidity. There is NO FAUL. Just the one and only Paul McCartney. 1942- still rockin and rollin
@@jaimeloeragarcia5675 so? Real people are changing with the time elapsing, no one is 100% same, people are not mannequins, there is 1,5 years gap between these two footages
Yeah he's screaming his lungs out in this concert...She's a Woman, Long Tall Sally, the high vocals for Tickets to Ride...that's the real Paul...fyi this video is satire
Lol. You guys are actually so funny. Paul and John, two of the best musicians and song writers in the world never existed. Well, ‘existed’, Paul still exists.
When you start digging the rabbit hole becomes deeper and deeper. So yes, very plausible or they used some doubles. But there is one fact sticking out - there must have been a serious reason behing their drastical change in appearances and behaviour after their coming back from the US in 1966
Oh yea and then there was the arrest in Japan where Paul #2, 3 or 4's finger prints didn't match what immigration had in it's database for Paul McCartney.
@@recordstreetbandFingerprints didn’t match, that was after Paul died in ‘66. Paul was arrested once in Germany, once in England. MI’5 and the Crown had to get involved to release Billy.
@@gaylealleluia8392 So Germany sends it's police file to Japan on a kid who set a condom on fire? Why? Do you know the real story? Charges were dropped against Paul and he was deported from Germany. So I doubt there was this big file on young Paul that they could check.😊
@Fab1us Who the fuck says something this fucking stupid? That's one of the more basic aspects of their fucking history, Candlestick park being the last, because they got the tired of the fame and all the bullshit. They talk about this in the documentary. They've been talking about this for 5 fucking decades. Good to know where the half-witted loonies of the world reside. Right here in this wank piss "PID" community shoveling this stupid shit wholesale down their throats. Can't believe I'm reading people having entire conversations of making whatever the fuck up to each other and both just making up convinced story after story. That Jamieloeragarcia comment thread is a fucking doozy of manic, half-witted admissions to what it looks like when people have no idea of the words, "citing. your. fucking. sources [and then going from there]." And no, some dumbass saying, "bUt TeH BiWwy ScheArZ MemOIr," doesn't make this horseshit true, nor that book anything but fictional horseshit, and unless somebody does their due diligence and researches and cross-references that book to the bitter fucking end, then it's a bunch of fat fucking loony weirdo making up a bunch of stupid shit. I'll give you this, the ear lobe discrepancy is interesting (at best), apart from that? A bunch of simpletons claiming that faces don't look the same when they look entirely the same, except for the earlobes. Compelling. Hardly a hill I'm going to choose to die on 😅
None of them could hear because of the equipment and the fans were screaming. You would not understand that dilemma unless you have performed live. End of discussion. Paul is alive.
hi. I just gotta say I have been performing live since 1988. I have shared the stage with Donavan. Martin Carthy. The Yetties. and many others. My self penned album 'Mill end Farm' was chosen folk album of the year on BBC radio Hereford and Worcester. See my other vids of my band Brickshed Music. We never had the screaming, but we did have lots of dodgy fold back. And we still knew when to come in
This theory is beyond pathetic, I guess in the UK there are loads of left handed musical geniuses that look identical, sing exactly like Paul McCartney.
Paul's switch out was planned. It took time for William to learn to play the limited songs he can play on bass. Otherwise, he is a classically trained pianist whose father headed his own successful orchestra. John was afraid the world would find out and the illuminati was afraid he would talk. That's another walk down the rabbit hole. Go take a look at the caretaker at the Macca home of birth in the 90's.....he look like someone you knew and loved?
The original John didn't like Faul so He left want back home to Liverpool. He's still Not dead today. The "John Lennon" assassination was also a grand hoax to let the actor retire. Paul and PHAURUS are alive it's just the latter took over the role and has mentioned He's not Paul. PIA think PHAULRUS IS PAUL. That's the brainwash still at work.
@@wesleycook7687 "Lady Madonna" is a big leap in keyboard Technique from 1966 era Paul #1. Faul/ Billy is a trained piano player. He often gets someone else to play bass (or Fender 6 string baritone guitar in the Get back/ Let it be movie) in his concerts/ performances. "Her Majesty " may in fact be a last demo tape by Macca #1. Yes I do think today's Ringo starr is also stand in for the $ Ka ching $ franchise. He always has another drummer on stage with him and has sunglasses welded to his head so we cannot see what colour is eyes really are. The Real John probably faked his own death to escape from this dark charade. There were a number of Fohn/ Johns too.Billy and Fingo's accents are not scouse at all.
Seems to me a lot of people would have had to stay quiet, nobody had even a death bed confession? How did they silence all the cops, fan girl nurses, the coroner, family, ex girlfriends of all of them, the replacement's family, such a massive cover up. How would it hold?
And why would they need to replace a kid in a band? The teenage girls would have been upset for a few days, and then they would have moved on to the next teen idol.
No nurses, no coroner. As for friends/family, if the spoke, someone (either them or family member was gone). The others were part of the secret brotherhood.
TE MENCIONO QUÉ PAUL EL VERDADERO, ESTABA DE NOVIO DE JANE ASHER...CUANDO VOLVIÓ DE UNA GIRA DE 5 MESES POR E.E.U.U...SE ENCONTRÓ QUÉ EL PAUL HABÍA CAMBIADO...LO CONOCÍA MUY BIEN...COMO CREES ENTONCES QUÉ LO ABANDONÓ Y ADEMÁS EL PADRE DE ESTA CHICA FUE ENCONTRADO MUERTO ? ...TE LA DEJO AHÍ PARA QUÉ INVESTIGUEN ANTES DE AFIRMAR TODO LO QUÉ SALEN DE SUS BOCAS.
I've seen many of the Paul is dead videos and some of them were a little more authentic then this one. My personal belief is that it was never true and when the rumor was originally spread The Beatles as well as the record companies ate it up and it became a big money maker. Only an idiot would believe such crap in the first place
There seems to be a Faul but that doesn't mean he permanently replaced him. So without skipping a beat Paul 2 slides on in to replace Paul 1. He fits right in with the rest of the group and from '66 onward pens some of the Beatles greatest hits like Penny Lane, Get Back, Black Bird, Lady Madonna, Let it be, etc., then goes on to have a great solo career with Wings. What are the astronomical odds that A. they find a guy who looks and sings just like him, and B. has the talent to write so many great tunes after replacing by Paul 1... mind boggling.
Good body language skills! I've seen a 1965 Japan concert with Faul but can't locate it on Utube anymore. It was clearly Faul, for what it's worth I've been on this for 10 years and I know was Faul. Moved on to John vs Fohn these days, and Fohn did a lot of appearances!
Yeah , Faul was a better musician . But in an interview from 1964 , John Haliday(aka Paul James McCartney) said he planned to retire “in a few years” and that’s exactly what went down. Brian Epstein had to go down with a drug overdose to influence the Beatles fans that now drugs was what all the STARS were using and doing . It was all a lie . Rex Makin took over all Brian Epstein’s assets and renamed them all Makin . Can’t make this stuff up!! But it’s all true. Look up Colin Unwin (the Original John Lennon) on YT . He has a channel with some great videos on it . I never fell for the lie way back when . I knew the whole band was changed and people still call me crazy. John Lennon looks nothing like John Lennon of 62 to 66. Colin Unwin does!! So does John Haliday as Paul. They’re best of friends and both worked at 20 Forthlin Rd. Not a coincidence!!
Sadly that's so true. Those who don't want their bubble burst, lash out. Happens all the time, everywhere. People really don't like to think they've been fooled....
What a load of crap.So not only do you need to find somebody who looks like Paul ,he also has to be left handed and sing /talk like him and it has to be kept secret for ever.😂
My point exactly there is no way they found a replacement so fast who was in fact a better songwriter and singer than Paul. And on top of that all the people who would have to keep it secret, someone would’ve been slipped up or admitted something 🤣
@@fleight9484 Does Faul have to scream it into your face that he isn't the real Paul? he literally said he joined the Beatles as an established band, real Paul cofound the Beatles. You're just too dismissive.
@@mikepaul145 don’t worry the naïve nature of my previous comment is in the past. It’s hard to argue with facts that the man is simply different. I can’t deny the Beatles we’re on some freemasonry type stuff. To much unexplained stuff happened in that 66/67 period.
@@peterf08 recaude there is no way hoy can have two guys with the same talent,same voice tone,left handed,able to play and sing at the same time and last but not least identical face,come on man.
@@peterf08 No, what YOU basing on? The truth is that Paul is alive until someone give a concret proof that he really died. YOU guys have to prove it, no us, it's like a christian asking for an atheist to prove that God isn't real, no, you guys believe in it, you guys have to prove.
@@kauadosreis3012 Thank you! I don't know why I keep watching this BS, a rabbit hole I wish I'd left alone. Its funny at first, but then pisses me off with how many people believe it, and how absurdly ridiculous the many theories go without a shred of evidence.
@@marshallhood9220 How is it funny? Approaching a serious subject in jest; will make the subject seem less serious. Watch Justice for James Paul McCartney. Plenty of people believe this because of the mountain of evidence. Your dismissal almost seems like wishful thinking. Simply asserting there isn't any evidence, doesn't destroy the evidence dummy. There's even pictures of Pauls' viscerally destroyed head and headless corpse.
What hurts me is thinking that happy go lucky guy who hit it big died and wasn’t able to enjoy a long life of success. That really sucks. I hope it’s all lies but then why would so many people lie.
Exactly. It's sinister, and he was denied the recognition and send-off he deserved. And yes, for all the nay-sayers, why would so many people have their suspicions - many innocent suspicions - in that they knew as soon as looking at the Sgt. Pepper cover something was up.
@@jennytaylor3324 Twenty years ago I had a dream that Paul was sacrificed. He was just looking at me and I was horrified. I woke up in tremendous sadness then blew it off as just a dream. Until years later all of this information started coming out that I began to expect the worst. It’s as if a beautiful flower that excited us all with his innocent joy for life that was a part of our growing up now has blood on it.
@@itsgleneaton4883 Wow, that's interesting. It sounds like more of a vision than just a dream. And it pre-dates the time when ordinary people would have any notion of any of this, when far fewer of us had internet at home. A lot of people say in comments that he seemed like a sweet, genuine person. They weren't much more than boys when they signed up with those who would control them - which may well have led to P's sacrifice. How could they have fully realised what they were getting in to? And the hints dropped very publicly by Heather Mills about the time of the divorce have always bothered me. I wonder what she knew about Faul that would be "too devastating" if it came out?
@@jennytaylor3324 it’s horrible finding out about so many things that involved the lives of people and Paul is definitely one of them. But out of the few who commit these horrible crimes against humanity they are very few compared to the many like us who do care about the lives of others. I think in the end we will win. But fir now we’ll just keep on fighting.
Your wrong sgt peppers tells it all if you think he grew a few inches and his feet got bigger and his eyes changed to hazel from brown in 1 year . Then so be it ,but that did happen
I'm going to see Paul (billy) McCartney tonite in fort Wayne Indiana I know he isnt Paul it's just a stage name now look into it Billy has been putting clues in his music with sgt peppers forward with wings and by himself he says it all the time that his is playing a part he is a clone etc band on the run listen to the lyrics look up Paul using latex I wish it wasnt true ,but it is. Everyday more info is coming out look up Paul having 6 toes on both feet but Paul from before 1966 has 5 toes it's been in our face but we were blind to the truth
@@jeremyb5468 No mate, YOU'RE WRONG. Paul us 100% alive and you need to get off the bloody peyote. Fuck PID. Macca lives!! 1942- still kickin' PID rumours' asses
@@jeremyb5468 You really believe that the "Fake"Paul was inches taller than the "real Paul" when all along that WAS Paul standing on a mound and that the shoe size difference is nothing but a hoax, and Paul has always worn the same size shoe?? You PID believers are quite stupid.
@@jeremyb5468 There is no "Billy", you stupid ass. Only Paul, the one and only. And, if he's a fake, why are you paying money to see him? You must like the "fake's" music, since he's actually the real Paul McCartney. Case closed.
Very interesting, wonderful speaking for itself research. How did You find out? Mustn't be William Campbell/Shears around 87 years old today? He seems to be younger, doesn't he?
Rubbish?? I think he’s correct . But was this his first gig?? As a 40+ year professional bassist I can tell you this is a different musician just from his playing . Billy Shears has admitted many times that he was brought into the Beatles as a organized affair. John Haliday is biological Paul . No doubt about it . Look him up. The whole band was replaced in 1966
Sgt Peppers Lonley Hearts Club band replaced and buried the old Beatles . Not just Paul was replaced. All 4 were !! Colin , John, Mark and Terry are the original Beatles and they were removed at a time when was necessary as they didn’t fit the status quo which was drugs sex and rock and roll. Rex Malkin replaced Brian Epstein. He didn’t die . Just a character change. Deception is all we get !!
@@rusherman2112 so we have gone from a simple McCartney's death (still crazy!) to all four Beatles were replaced! Well thanks for making me laugh mate! John Halliday could never have been Paul McCartney, you see Halliday is only 5-ft 7 inches tall and is 6 years younger than McCartney! Which means when McCartney was singing "love me do" in 1962 Halliday was sitting at his desk at school he was only 14!
Forensic Files has a new link on U Tube. Found it by accident. The thing is if you make a negative comment, you are deleted instantly. If she doesn't want anyone disagreeing with her she should be banned. It was 3 hours old and I was deleted. I came back later and the postings had disappeared. Something fishy here.
It’s funny how this Paul looks exactly like the original Paul, then the Paul we see today looking different. Something is not adding up. Plus, this is from 1966 not 1965.
@@BasicLeigh Biden looks completely different yeah, but that does tend to happen when you age. Can’t tell me with a straight face you actually think an 82 year old is fake because he aged.
@@BasicLeigh Musicians tend to change their style a lot over the course of their career. Paul is left handed, and while the cigarette theory seems like a hint, I think he just wanted it in the shot because the camera was to his right. And I don’t know where you found that they “hated” America.
I guess George was smoking the same stuff when he calls faul 'william' in the scorsese doc and his wife calls him 'billy' on the red carpet also when George also calls him 'faul' in the 80s interview all available on youtube. Memoirs of billy shears novel says it all narrated by George Martins son and no legal or copyright legal action taken. I buried Paul - end of strawberry fields. I could easily go on............ But they done a good job admittedly.
@@miracles4u sorry, Matthew. If you are talking about the 80s interview on Australian tv, there is a YT post out there where it's claimed George said "faul." In the actual interview he clearly says Paul.
@@miracles4u yes they were all on something. everyone. Every single human that had contact or knowledge of The Beatles since 1960. Everyone "IN" for whatever absurd reason ever given... what a gigantic load of crap for crying out loud 🤦♀️🤦♀️
@@stormduchess3128 Sorry storm. Not only has George greeted Faul as William, Ringo said "There's two left drag one is William". Can you explain Pauls' nose growing longer? or his entire fucking skull for that matter? Doubters are more annoying than those who mistake John Halliday as Paul. Paul died horribly.
Another thing. There are other videos of the Beatles playing live. They didn't have monitors, so they couldn't hear themselves. The amps were crappy, the joke wad they sounded like 10,000 transistor radios. So, George had to look at John to know when the song was over. And with the screaming girls, nobody could tell if they played well or not. As far as Paul having chubby cheeks, nobody looks the same as they did young. Think of Robert Downey Jr. He looks completely different now compared to now.
@@mehitablestorm8877 memoirs talks about how it took Billy a little while to learn to play left handed. That being done in late 1966. Unless someone was behind the stage playing for him., which is possible.
@@HugoKaiju536 of course it fiction. It even states that it is. If you haven’t read it, then maybe you should. There is often more more truth in fiction then want to admit.
What about all the make up artists over the yrs??They Did'nt discover the latex'no?Plausible or laughable'This is getting ridicolus.The most current story is they were all imposters...If so,I guess I'm more impressed than ever👍🏼
"Faul" wrote some of the best songs in the history of pop music. Furthermore, his songs were better than Paul's. The Paul is dead theory is one of the stupidest conspiracy theories I know. If it is really true that Paul died in 65, then in an incredibly short time someone was found who was made to look like Paul using the surgery at the time without any visible scars. This person, "Faul," spoke in the same voice as Paul and looked so much like him that only a small community today is convinced it is not Paul. Videos and photos are meticulously compiled to prove the smallest alleged irregularities on the faces of Paul and “Faul”. This shows very clearly how incredibly good plastic surgery was back then ;). And ultimately, highly sensitive, intelligent people like John, Ringo and George performed and smiled on stage next to him. There was no trace of sadness, they obviously went through it cold. But they have hidden hundreds of hidden messages in their songs and album covers. This is all incredibly absurd.
Exactly that Japanese press conference first scene he's towering over all of them - gets word then brings chair down or removes cushion to Lower himself - it's so obvious Definitely not the original
Part 1: Paul. Mouth pallet, ears, eyes, nose, eyebrows and the love of one another. You’re right, tho, he was very sick. Part 2 & 3: yeah, he’s taller but he could have had higher heels bc it’s Paul. Keep in mind, allegedly, he was being slowly poisoned at that time as a form of torture
Paul looks so much different, I can’t believe they got away with it, what ever drugs you’re on please go easy on them, this video is absolutely ridiculous LOL!
Checkout Gary Gibson Lennon impersonator When you see just how much Gary looks like John especially a young John you will be blown away and to make matters worse Gary plays guitar as well then it will Dawn on you that Paul could have been replaced not all together but for the sake of filming, live performance etc
So they found a guy that looked like him, sang like him, played left handed like him, and he was a world class songwriter lol. Cause "Faul" would have written Sgt Peppers, She's Leaving Home, Hey Jude, Blackbird, Let It Be etc. Crazy nonsense.
There was no CGI in the mid-60s. And at this point if this were true- the guy’s been touring for 50 years, he’s damn good, why not just come out and admit it now?
And all these clowns talk.about "cgi", "latex fillimgs" endless !advanced cosmetic surgery seemingly forgetting this was the friggin' mid sixties! What is going on in their conniving little minds?!
Lol,I don't see anything different, they were just chilling out and having fun of themselves, I think their gears didn't work properly that night and most likely they also were a bit high on something ..
@@wesleycook7687DIVERTIDOS ES CUANDO TE VEN LA CARA DE INCAUTO Y CREES TODO LO QUÉ TE MUESTRAN POR TV, ...INVESTIGA POR QUÉ AL BUEN MAL EVANS ROUDIES INCONDICIONAL DE THE BEATLES ESTUVO DESDE SUS COMIENZOS Y SOSPECHOSAMENTE MUERE ACRIBILLADO POR UN POLICÍA...EXTRAÑAMENTE UN POCO ANTES DE LANZAR SU LIBRO DE CONFIDENCIAS CUANDO ESTUVE CON THE BEATLES ...QUÉ ME DICES A ESO SABIONDO ? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 AAH, ESTOS SE LA CREEN TODO LO QUÉ LE QUIEREN QUÉ CREAN Y CAEN REDONDITOS.... INVESTIGUEN CARAMBA 😂😂😂
@@mariaelisamalpartida3051 I've watched many other videos and listened to interviews of authors of books. It's no joke. There was at least 3 Pauls and possibly 2 Johns. You have a multimillion dollar band and you're gonna let it all go just because one dies?
@@mariaelisamalpartida3051 Look at Will Farrell and the Red Hot Chilli Peppers drummer. What are the odds 2 famous people look alike? Even greater odds a double of us is out there. Not that the 3 Pauls looked alike. Easy to tell them apart with the internet. Height alone. Head shape.
@@mariaelisamalpartida3051 I hear you but why is it no one is claiming Ringo is the original Ringo? Where there's smoke there's fire and where there's will there's a way. Not that this is the most important conspiracy in history, for every one conspiracy we hear about there's probably 10 others burried with the bodies.
Well spotted. There is an earlier appearance of yet another Faul with Dusty Springfield ( the one where she talks about his eyebrows). That Faul doesn’t sing though, just mimes. I think he was just put in for interviews and such. This Faul you are showing was the musician who sang (Billy), he was at both the Shea stadium performances, real Paul I don’t think ever appeared there.
hi, thanks, I just watched the Dusty vid. this looks more like CGI. They alter nearly all film of red Paul. look at Pauls ears. It becomes easier to spot if you slow down the vid. They also make his nose longer
Real Paul has never appeard playing with The Beatles. They were all Fauls, right from the start. It All happened when Jim told him, he cannot go to Hamburg with lads cause he had to study. Then they found Billy Faul Cuntbell
This is footage from 65-66, that's been enhanced today by CGI. This footage was laying around for years because there was no reason to destroy it. This guy just happened to get a copy and enhanced it to keep the Paul is Dead myth going. Paul is very much alive. There is no big cover up. There is nothing to cover since even John Lennon said it was a joke started by an American DJ in late 66 and went viral, creating a series of books until 69. Now, in the 21st century it's back and the theories are even more bullcrap than in the 60s. It must be younger people pushing this old tired myth again . Most of us that were teens in the 60s dismissed it and went on with our lives.
OH MY GOD!! YOU PEOPLE ARE ABSOLUTELY INSANE!! I WAS LAUGHING SO HARD AT THIS UTTER NONSENSE!! Stop with all this speculation. We're living in a time where all you have to do is get a DNA sample from him and find out if it's your beloved Billy. Just stop already!!
No, it's the Paul. He doesn't look at the neck when he plays, he bounces off the microphone as usual, he's of normal height, he has his normal hoarse voice. He's a little slow, but maybe he's just nervous or not feeling very well.
Hilarious,from the comments I realize many Ppl simply don't get that this is just a joke on behalf of all the Ppl.who actually believe in the ridicolus theory.A woman is trying to prove(through facial recogn.)That Paul is an imposter(Billy)Fair enough,but last time I checked,she claimed there were about 12 Pauls & The Beatles were just a Travistick invention.(Fabricated 4)When Ppl.go on about latex,& Phil Stanshill etc.I keep asking myself if Internet is a blessing or a curse...🤔🤐☺️
It's the same chubby face through the entire video. Here's a tip. The real Paul played with a pick because he was a converted guitarist who took up the bass when Stu Sutcliffe, who was an awful bass player, left the band. Sometimes Paul looks at his hands and sometimes he does not. Check out playing Don't Let Me Down. He's not looking at his hands... Were there Beatles look a likes? Perhaps. They have them now. Go to Vegas and you'll see a whole bunch of Left handed Paul look a likes....
![BRASIL vs. PERÚ [4-0] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 10](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tbyOJKXfQnI/mqdefault.jpg)
![Who Wrote a Short Story That Seriously Disturbed a Teacher? | Dirty Laundry x Smosh [Full Episode]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bvHAy_rKoEI/mqdefault.jpg)
Very good! You are, one of the few people who locate Faul with The Beatles before 1966 or 1967.
two Paul from 1961, one of them was retired and appears Faul in 1963.
@@Tenny_RW There were at least 3 Pauls. No doubt. The original had a side to side head bobble and was shorter than John Lennon.
True that. I thought Faul come post 1966.
Don't you understand this is a joke?
@@bdickerson7898 It's not a joke. There was at least 3 Pauls. People do die in car accidents, it's not so outlandish to consider and that was the rumor. The original had a side to side head bobble and was shorter than John Lennon, about the same height as George. Then there was the arrest in Japan where Paul #3 or #2 spent 9 days in jail for using a passport as an imposter. Paul #1's fingerprints were on file and they didn't match the imposter's. The British MI6 had to get involved to get him out. Anyhow, look at the post 1967 videos. The side to side head bobble is gone. And he's taller than John Lennon. There's no doubt in my mind there was at least 3 if not 4 Paul and maybe 2 John Lennons but I'm still on the fence. His nose had an odd shape to it in later years.
I don’t know why people still have a hard time believing that lookalikes are used to temporarily or permanently replace high profile public figures. Saddam Hussein famously had three lookalikes in rotation. And it’s been officially confirmed that a lookalike was used to replace Britney Spears on at least one occasion, and it was a meet and greet where fans get to see the star up close, and yet only a few sharp-eyed fans noticed that it wasn’t her.
Saddam Hussein may have had doubles for a whole host of reasons including the fact that he was in the gun sights of a host of actors.
Britney Spears may have slighted one of her fanatical fans, so rather than admit she was capable of such an act, they deny it was her.
As far as Paul goes, there was no reason to replace this kid from a boy band in 1966. The Beatles were not very important. The mistake PID makes is, they believe the hype of the Beatles. They want to claim they are so enlightened, but they believe all the propaganda about how significant this group was. They weren't.
In 1966 the Beatles were important to teenage girls in the West and Japan. The rest of the world was consumed with the Cold War, Vietnam, Civil Rights, poverty, etc. The Warsaw Pact, China, India and the vast majority of the world didn't know or care about these individuals from the UK.
@@IndependentAnalyst Wow! That's a bizarre understanding of how huge an impact The Beatles had on the whole world. Yes, horrible wars going on then, as now, all based on lies, but young people and teenagers in particular world-wide, were consumed with Beatlemania. It's tragic that Paul died in 1966--or was assassinated.
@@pjmurphy920 I don't know what you think is bizarre.
"young people and teenagers in particular world-wide"
Actually no. As I pointed out, "The Warsaw Pact, China, India and the vast majority of the world didn't know or care about these individuals from the UK."
Rock music was considered the outgrowth of Western capitalist decadence. The idea that Red Guards in China, Komsomol in Russia, or youth in Islamic republics knew or cared about the Beatles is ridiculous. They barely toured outside the English speaking world.
If you were over the age of 20 in 64 you had little interest in the Beatles. Most parents hated them. There were even songs about it, see Allen Shermans' "Pop Hates the Beatles."
McCartney could have died in 66 (he didn't) and believe it or not, the world would have kept turning. He was just not at all important.
And theres a reason why we all know they were fakes
People are lied to all of their lives and I knew Paul was replaced when I lived in Germany in the mid to late 60's. I was mad for a long time and now I just live with it. Most people loved the Beatles so they can't accept Paul being replaced. When Governments get involved weird and corrupt things happen. Normal people are so deep in the hole, we'll never be told the truth. Believe what makes you feel good. I can be right and I can be wrong. That's life.
cringe
Paul is one of two living Beatles. The Beatles music changed drastically in 66 bordering on psychedelic. It wasn't until the 70s that they got back to basic. Their looks changed in 66, they looked rough and totally unlike their former clean shaven selves.
So the government is involved, too?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
thanks..
Believe what makes you happy or believe what is plausible. Your choice.
Paul last appearance was in Seattle 1966. He was never seen alive again after that show. The first replacement played at candlestick park. Paul died close to September 11, 1966. He was 22 years old. This video was made for fun. The subject of PID, is a horrible one and not funny at all. The host is correct when he says Paul drove the girls wild, and he did lead the band. Faul did not drive the chicks the same way. One was hot, one was not
That would be my assessment as well. Paul #2 was taller than George and didn't have the same side to side head bobble. And today I'm pretty sure it's Paul #3 if not #4. It was not out of the ordinary for a celeb to die but people want to believe what they're told by mass media. Either he died because of an accident or maybe he didn't want to participate in the promotion of the drug culture as so many of those bands who oh by the way were related to government personnel and never oh by the way drafted into the Vietnam war, and never arrested for drug possession. I wonder if they were mules of the day, or distributors.
I think there was a replacement for John too now that I look closer at his nose.
I think the personality thing is one of the biggest clues. James Paul was so witty and charming. Came across as genuine and kind. The later Paul seems absurdly cocky, and unpleasant.
@@MsDormy no doubt there 3 or 4.
I guess you are kidding... must be a joke.
{this video is fiction and for entertainment purposes only]
It is amazing that they were able to find s replacement as handsome as Paul McCartney, as left handed as him, who could also sing with a multi-octave voice that scored top ten hits over the next four decades, and the guy they found was able to play brilliant bass guitar, credible lead guitar, as well as acoustic guitar and piano. Well Done Faul!!
I know right lol. I have a joke I make that if Paul really did die in 1966 and Faul gave us all the other music, than that’s an amazing tale in and of itself and he should be praised haha. Instead of taking a dead man’s name
The first Paul was found in Liverpool
ruclips.net/video/6UTDvwqHb7o/видео.html
@@hectoryeeben6585 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🍻🍻
Stephen, William looked little like Paul, is right handed, is classically trained in both voice and instrument and is not as good a bass player as Paul.
@@kennymilne6817 and The Earth is flat
If that’s the case then they would’ve had a exact lookalike for ringo when he was sick during a tour in 1964 for a bit. Hell, what if all the Beatles were sick and they were all replaced???
They were ALL secretly replaced by the Ruttles!
Well we know that the world is filled with most people living inside the Box unaware that there's even windows. I took 4 years off and on looking at hundreds of different photographs and videotape and then seeing things that had been synced and it wasn't sent correctly to make us believe that William Campbell AKA Billy Shears the guy that's on the stage in this video has taken the place of James Paul McCartney. But believe me it took me a long time to be able to wrap my head around that this could possibly have happened, and I couldn't see the difference 100% and if that wasn't going to be 100% that I would be still wondering. Or probably paying attention at all like I did for the first 50 years of my life. But then I would run across pictures and I'd kind of pick it up and run with it again and then one day I saw the difference. And then I tested myself off and on for quite some time by looking at pictures to see if I could see the difference between the two. And what I found that convinced me was there was an innocence, proper mannerisms from James Paul McCartney the original. And the type of uncouth not raise perhaps in a house where manners were expected kind of rough around the edges I saw William Campbell. And since that day like 5 years ago I can see the difference instantly. And then when he did that interview with David Letterman find it on RUclips they talk about it the conspiracy and where did dark brown eyes disappear on James Hall McCartney and become kind of Hazel Green? Eye color doesn't change some people say where's contacts I don't think so because what would explain the very slender nose? Because men's noses have a tendency to get a little broader with age and not slender with age. But everybody to himself it does take time and maybe an interest in seeing if there was anything truth 🕊️🇺🇲🕊️off as the biggest hoax on the entire planet.
Excellent find a footage 👍 have you done it Yesterday comparison? I'm I'm finding it harder to find the original song I think that the conspirators have remastered a lot of their music prior William Campbell which really ticks me off. I remember there was a video out there and it was showing the difference between the two singing Yesterday , James Paul McCartney sang in H pitch. William Campbell could only sing that in a G pitch. And when he was in the band wings and saying yesterday it was horrible. And they tried to kind of cover it up cuz I'm so horrible he made some excuse because he left off the ending. And being from that generation we don't realize how we have memorized every note of a song until somebody screws it up. Put a blindfold on us put our generations music out there and where to tell you who is singing that song! Enjoy your channel thumbs up 👍🕊️🇺🇲 Kathleen the Pacific Northwest 🌲
The thing is, Paul DIED. They needed Billy, who was also a musician
John was probably replaced, looks likely. I don't think Ringo was replaceable - too idiosyncratic. And George I don't think they cared enough about.
John and Paul knew how to share a mic like nobody else. Never worked the same with Faul.
Never worked, period! The band stopped touring by '67...
@@larkefedifero66
So what happened here was: the gear they were using (mainly the microphones) were very dodgy, so all through that show John/George/Paul had to fix up the mics. It even got to the point where the platform that ringos drums were on wasnt rotating (the show was meant to end with the drums rotating because of the rotating platform), so either you're high as hell or you believe all that stuff about him dying.
Read the description...It's a joke,a good one indeed😂But seriously,the biggest concern is how many who actually believe this to be real...😏
@@rebeccajelenawang4306 Yeah we can't have those fucking peons thinking with an open mind. What's so concerning about that?
PAUL NEVER LOOKS HIS GUITAR, BUT BILLY SHEARS DOES IT !!!!
Have you even been in a room with a guitar? The only people who buy into the whole looking at his fretboard thing have obviously never played an instrument (to a professional level). Paul was playing the same 20 songs for about 2.5 years every single day and by the end of the 65 tour It was muscle memory. Those songs have very simple bass parts in comparison to what he was doing later that year and beyond. You can see that muscle memory in the get back docu when they go through old numbers. In this clip you can see all 3 of the other Beatles look at their (far less complex to sing with) instruments. Were they all replaced then??
@martingodinez3771 he looks at it all the time. In an old video, I watched them perform, "Please, please me". Paul never looks at his guitar, & that's some excellent playing.
@@TheEvbox Glad someone else said it. I look at my hands when I am playing really difficult things I am learning, while I DONT when the muscle memory is baked in. I play:
Guitar
Bass
Stand up bass
Pipe Organ
Drums
Arabic Percussion
I'm also a classically trained composer and conductor.
Looking at one's fingers for a difficult passage is not a crime.
Many know they switched Paul. But few people understand why.
The reason is the Beatles was a carefully designed operation. It was a centerpiece of the youth revolution. That's why the powers behind didn't want to risk ruining their project. It is also why they had a replacement ready in case one was needed. That was always a part of the plan.
The whole Beatle mania thing was planned and manufactured. No, they didn't write those songs. They were written by a group of professionals, carefully picked by the system. And no, they also didn't sell as many records as they tell you. The key thing is that you believe they did.
The 'girls screaming' were often just a track of sound added in post production. They would also hire actors to play hardcore fans for concerts to create their mania. The public would then imitate what they saw, thinking it was real.
The point of the whole pop/rock project was to shape society. By altering culture the powers behind get to alter people's values and behavior. So in the end it's about power and control.
That, in short, is why they implemented a fake Paul instead of simply replacing the bass player in the open.
Yea ok buddy😂😂😂
Spot on!!! Other high up people have confirmed this - not just in the music arena, but ALL arenas - people, we are being played!!!
So..where did you get all this information from???😳👍👍👍👍
@@georgeharrison243 Lifetime of research. Many sources lost to time.
@@varmastiko2908 can you share sources?
I need to find my Faul so I can disappear, go on vacation and get some rest.
Fave (false dave)
Paul was never the Beatles "frontman" - No one was, but if their was one, it would have been John Lennon who was the leader of the group --Not even their producer George Martin could decide who'd be the frontman, so Martin, drawing upon his experience recording British comedy groups essentially invented the Rock Band, whereas before the Beatles there was only Elvis, or Little Richard, Buddy Holly Jerry Lee, etc. backed by a back up band of often changing unobtrusive musicians whom the public rarely even knew their names..
A voice of reason among the seriously and dangerously deluded.
William became their new bandleader when he replaced JPM late 1966 "as an already set up affair".
@@olskzeri1476 Ah yes, the imaginary William from an alternate universe.
@@NickNack-l4q PRICELESS!!!
..and as we all know there was only one Elvis, there was no chance "they" could ever replace that guy!
Oh good grief, how ludicrous. That’s Paul McCartney. Our faces all thin out when we get older and he looks exactly the same.
Do your eyes go from brown to green, you suddenly get much taller and your whole build alters ?
damn you are just stupid...duhhh
@@yves2694 No and neither did Paul's.
Excellent!!!
@@yves2694 yep. There's that.
Paul has the charming look 🥰 my crush. Faul is serious type. This is my first time to see this. Meaning Faul was officially a sub to Paul. Obviously he cant copy that Natural head shaking and footwork and dancing. Its so sad that the real paul was not given tribute. I hope the music industry or maybe somone who knows the truth will tell us one day.
You clearly haven't seen many interviews with Paul post 1966 if you don't see the funny, charming Paul that has always been, and still is. But of course there are more serious interviews as bad things happen in our lives as time passes. Also, people are often a bit more thoughtful and serious as they grow older. Look at all of them. They were all joking around in all their interviews in the beginning, but got more serious in the later Beatles years, so why is it ok for John, George and Ringo to get more serious and not Paul?
You only think Paul can't shake his head because this guy tells you that he is trying (it's a joke video by the way). Maybe he's just not doing it here. Maybe he stopped doing it altogether, Who knows? If that's the only evidence you have to cling to, then maybe you should stop and have a think. There are endless videos showing evidence of Paul being the same before and after 1966. Same teeth, same eyes, same voice, same vocal range and so on.
Here's are a couple for you:
ruclips.net/video/8_LiyvEErMc/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/XeB7czisBlQ/видео.html
Peace out.
This is great. I think Faul played at Candlestick Park Aug 28 1966 and also did the press conference in LA right after. I had a theory that something happened in 1964 to Paul, thus the song When I'm 64. New sub here.
Paul McCartney is a fictitious name, otherwise the replacement/double for the Swain would have ended the ruse when he ended the Beatles. Nobody could otherwise live with something that wasn't just a stage name near sixty years. He has no problem running away with the name that never belonged to the original Swain either. As to when and why they replaced the Swain, nobody but Ringo Star (another fictitious character) could tell you. But he merely screws with Beatle Bill and never comes clean.
@@SpaceGhost67 Swain? 🤔
@@SpaceGhost67
What is Swain?
@@SpaceGhost67 Actually, it's worse than that. When these musicians sign their first contract, they are usually young, older adolescents or young adults in their early 20s. They don't usually hire a lawyer as they are just so thrilled to have a music contract. So, what the music contract says is the record company can use their name and their likeness in perpetuity. That last word means forever.
Then, when they get famous, they decide they want to go in a different direction, they find out they should have hired a lawyer with the first contract. So, when Paul died or left, the Record company had the rights to his looks and his name, in perpetuity. Billy Shepard, the Faul guy, or whoever he is walked right in a took the name since Paul was already famous and Paul's likeness, and here you go.
The same thing happened to Prince and that's why he changed his name to a symbol. Prince even talked about this in interviews before he died and tells all about how it works. Also, the same thing happened to Dave Chappelle, the comedian, and he made a video telling all about it as well. I would think both these videos may still be up on YT. It happens all the time to these young singers who become famous, then they find out they have signed a contract that requires dancing with the devil, and they can't get out of it and if they do, it may cost them their lives. Bob Dillon talked about his contract with the devil with Bill Bradley in an interview still on YT. Others have talked about it too. It's frequently called the Faustian bargain or "Selling your soul" so to speak. It is the real Hotel California. So, they do what they're told even if it's taking on the religion of those running the business, and as you can see from how they dress and sing is a very dark religion.
yep
Heather mills on gmtv nearly let the cat out the bag,must watch how she was lied to by faul!.
Don't see why all these true believers can't conceive of their heroes using doubles.They used doubles to divert fans at some of their shows so they could get to the gig & not get killed.Anyone notice how quickly their management replaced Ringo with Jimmy Nichols for a European tour?Brian Epstein was not going to let anything or anyone (even a dead Beatle)stop that money train.I'm certain by 65' or 66" they figured they could almost throw anyone up on that stage & Billy is so obviously taller & stouter but they found out it worked & if bio Paul really bit it do you think the rest of them including all the hangers on that Lennon despised were going to say goodbye to all that moola?F#*k no!It's all a big fantasy the fans have of the happy go lucky heroes skipping along in total harmony.Which in reality ended in Billie suing the other 3 because it was really about money.That's the fuel for the engine that makes bands or any enterprise run.Remember John sang"The Dream Is Over".WAKE UP FAB FANS!
Beatles were never my heros but I find the theory somewhat intriguing , some Ppl.seem to want the cute cherub face looking lad back,Paul was no angel though,as soon as a contract is signed=show/business.I see changes in appaearance,but to me it looks like drugs'fame'touring,exploring,experminenting,experiences in general made them all change more or less.They could'nt look like quadruplets forever,the group split a few yrs later anyw.Plus much more but some PID'ers get so mad I decided to try & Let it be.
@@rebeccajelenawang4306 Yea but you don't grow 4 inches in one year at age 22. And the signature side to side head bobble was gone by 1967 when all the lyrics were drug and occult references. Definitely a part of Tavistock.
@@warntheidiotmasses7114 yea..I agree... don't know about Tavistock though....are they nefarious also..crikey..this whole thing is so freakin dark..a real shame, and a sham.!😤🤷
@@sanctifyme4543 Yea government agencies ordered billions of doses of LSD from one of the big harma companies. Control the masses by drugging them while your own sect becomes doctors, lawyers, bankers and law makers.
@@sanctifyme4543 The LOVE will heal everything. We just have to find it. Imbue ourselves in it. And spread it all around. ❤️
God has His hand in everything, and everything is meant to lead to love in the end. If it hasn't, it just means that it isn't the end yet. It is promised that the best is yet to come. 💖
Wow you've done it - this is smoking gun footage brilliant stuff - he couldn't lead or shake his head while singing it was just a clumsy nod - James Paul McCartney had it perfectly synchronized - here we have his stand in - and yes he looks like today's Faul its him alright - this all means Faul was a double before 66 - James Paul was sick - head cold sick or dying sick ?
Bill is on the original mono record covers. my brother has them. I think Bill was brought in in 1963 because Paul had crooked teeth.
Still shocked on how people think faul is real, like are you kidding me?! Out of all the Beatles I’d think John would be the one who got a replacement due to how much he changed in the 60s
Paul: Trying to mature as an artist and not doing the boy band head shaking thing This video: It's obvs Faul
I wouldn't use the word obviously, when you are so obviously wrong.
I'm surprised there has been no attempt to quash these rumors with a DNA sample.
The only problem is that William's DNA sample didn't match JPM's daughter Bettina.
@@olskzeri1476 There was a DNA sample taken when Faul visited Japan with his weed stuff. Police took his fingerprints which didn´t match to the Paul´s fingerprints taken in Germany.
Because people behind and those in the industry knew the truth but not the Fans
@@kheigalang1053 the truth is out there -- the "fans" wish to remain ignorant as is typical for sheeple-type humans
@@uy7munir Yes of course. You and your little minority are the clever ones (ignoring every bit of evidence that Paul is Paul), while the rest of the world is ignorant. If that feeling makes you happy, then bless your little heart. In the meantime, the rest of us can enjoy McCartney 1942 - present day.
The footage is ALL Paul. So what if he looked unsure in the latter footage. No artist is 100% on, all the bluudy time, mate...There is the good with the bad. For you to say that "Faul" took over is pure stupidity. There is NO FAUL. Just the one and only Paul McCartney. 1942- still rockin and rollin
Artur Axmann7777 amen brother
@@thebeatledude2874 m.facebook.com/groups/841701519210096?view=permalink&id=3440000149380207¬if_t=video_processed¬if_id=1603839579323987&ref=m_notif
"I've seen religion from Jesus to Paul"-John Lennon his song "I Found Out"
@@jaimeloeragarcia5675 so? Real people are changing with the time elapsing, no one is 100% same, people are not mannequins, there is 1,5 years gap between these two footages
William joined Beatles "as an already set up affair" late 1966.
You can see the anxiety/hesitation in Faul.
Yeah he's screaming his lungs out in this concert...She's a Woman, Long Tall Sally, the high vocals for Tickets to Ride...that's the real Paul...fyi this video is satire
I don't believe there ever was a "real" Paul or John, they just kept the act going at all costs.
Until 1970 when they let the 'fakes' break up the band at the peak of their creative powers? Yeah makes sense 🙄
Lol. You guys are actually so funny. Paul and John, two of the best musicians and song writers in the world never existed. Well, ‘existed’, Paul still exists.
@@O5o787 Paul died in 1966 but carry on believing in the lie.
@@maratonlegendelenemirei3352 sure. I don’t care what you say really. You can have your theorys and we’ll have our….facts
When you start digging the rabbit hole becomes deeper and deeper. So yes, very plausible or they used some doubles. But there is one fact sticking out - there must have been a serious reason behing their drastical change in appearances and behaviour after their coming back from the US in 1966
Ah yes, 1960's cgi. Defo real, defo not fake, defo possible in the 60's.
You defo know we haven't had tech witheld from us. You defo don't pee laying down.
The Beatles toured for the last time in 1966 to promote Revolver and they played not one single song from Revolver at any of their gigs?
Played paperback writer recorded during REVOLVER sessions
Oh yea and then there was the arrest in Japan where Paul #2, 3 or 4's finger prints didn't match what immigration had in it's database for Paul McCartney.
@user-gg6hx2yh5t It all makes sense when you study all available information. 3 or 4 Pauls, 2 or 3 Johns, and at least 1 double for the others.
That's a lie. Paul had his passport on hand, and everything matched what the government had on file from when the Beatles first toured Japan.
@@recordstreetband believe what you want
@@recordstreetbandFingerprints didn’t match, that was after Paul died in ‘66. Paul was arrested once in Germany, once in England. MI’5 and the Crown had to get involved to release Billy.
@@gaylealleluia8392 So Germany sends it's police file to Japan on a kid who set a condom on fire? Why?
Do you know the real story? Charges were dropped against Paul and he was deported from Germany. So I doubt there was this big file on young Paul that they could check.😊
The real Paul played all the live shows untill aug 66, but this way funny. thanks
The reason this wasn't Billy, they stopped playing live because Billy is right handed.
@@dannycrotch5188 Problem with your theory is that the decision to stop touring had already been made before Paul's supposed demise.
@@thelordofliberty6984and the source is "trust me, bro"?
@@Fab1us The source is interviews with John and George. Heck.. don't trust me. I wasn't alive in 1966. Trust Lennon and Harrison
@Fab1us Who the fuck says something this fucking stupid? That's one of the more basic aspects of their fucking history, Candlestick park being the last, because they got the tired of the fame and all the bullshit. They talk about this in the documentary. They've been talking about this for 5 fucking decades.
Good to know where the half-witted loonies of the world reside. Right here in this wank piss "PID" community shoveling this stupid shit wholesale down their throats. Can't believe I'm reading people having entire conversations of making whatever the fuck up to each other and both just making up convinced story after story. That Jamieloeragarcia comment thread is a fucking doozy of manic, half-witted admissions to what it looks like when people have no idea of the words, "citing. your. fucking. sources [and then going from there]."
And no, some dumbass saying, "bUt TeH BiWwy ScheArZ MemOIr," doesn't make this horseshit true, nor that book anything but fictional horseshit, and unless somebody does their due diligence and researches and cross-references that book to the bitter fucking end, then it's a bunch of fat fucking loony weirdo making up a bunch of stupid shit.
I'll give you this, the ear lobe discrepancy is interesting (at best), apart from that? A bunch of simpletons claiming that faces don't look the same when they look entirely the same, except for the earlobes. Compelling. Hardly a hill I'm going to choose to die on 😅
None of them could hear because of the equipment and the fans were screaming. You would not understand that dilemma unless you have performed live. End of discussion. Paul is alive.
hi. I just gotta say I have been performing live since 1988. I have shared the stage with Donavan.
Martin Carthy. The Yetties. and many others.
My self penned album 'Mill end Farm' was chosen folk album of the year on BBC radio Hereford and Worcester. See my other vids of my band Brickshed Music. We never had the screaming, but we did have lots of dodgy fold back. And we still knew when to come in
Yes ma'am!
I think the real Paul.. or perhaps the fake one died as Neil Aspinwall in 2008
Yea there speakers were not the best but Paul was replaced honestly bro
He is alive it’s dumb cause they found out about it and played on to the theory to make fans be like this and it’s hilarious
This theory is beyond pathetic, I guess in the UK there are loads of left handed musical geniuses that look identical, sing exactly like Paul McCartney.
Paul's switch out was planned. It took time for William to learn to play the limited songs he can play on bass. Otherwise, he is a classically trained pianist whose father headed his own successful orchestra. John was afraid the world would find out and the illuminati was afraid he would talk. That's another walk down the rabbit hole. Go take a look at the caretaker at the Macca home of birth in the 90's.....he look like someone you knew and loved?
The original John didn't like Faul so He left want back home to Liverpool. He's still Not dead today. The "John Lennon" assassination was also a grand hoax to let the actor retire. Paul and PHAURUS are alive it's just the latter took over the role and has mentioned He's not Paul. PIA think PHAULRUS IS PAUL. That's the brainwash still at work.
Paul also plays piano. Read The Beatles Unseen Archives by Tim Hill and Marie Clayton.
@@wesleycook7687 "Lady Madonna" is a big leap in keyboard Technique from 1966 era Paul #1. Faul/ Billy is a trained piano player. He often gets someone else to play bass (or Fender 6 string baritone guitar in the Get back/ Let it be movie) in his concerts/ performances. "Her Majesty " may in fact be a last demo tape by Macca #1. Yes I do think today's Ringo starr is also stand in for the $ Ka ching $ franchise. He always has another drummer on stage with him and has sunglasses welded to his head so we cannot see what colour is eyes really are. The Real John probably faked his own death to escape from this dark charade. There were a number of Fohn/ Johns too.Billy and Fingo's accents are not scouse at all.
Seems to me a lot of people would have had to stay quiet, nobody had even a death bed confession? How did they silence all the cops, fan girl nurses, the coroner, family, ex girlfriends of all of them, the replacement's family, such a massive cover up. How would it hold?
And why would they need to replace a kid in a band? The teenage girls would have been upset for a few days, and then they would have moved on to the next teen idol.
No nurses, no coroner. As for friends/family, if the spoke, someone (either them or family member was gone). The others were part of the secret brotherhood.
Exactly!
TE MENCIONO QUÉ PAUL EL VERDADERO, ESTABA DE NOVIO DE JANE ASHER...CUANDO VOLVIÓ DE UNA GIRA DE 5 MESES POR E.E.U.U...SE ENCONTRÓ QUÉ EL PAUL HABÍA CAMBIADO...LO CONOCÍA MUY BIEN...COMO CREES ENTONCES QUÉ LO ABANDONÓ Y ADEMÁS EL PADRE DE ESTA CHICA FUE ENCONTRADO MUERTO ? ...TE LA DEJO AHÍ PARA QUÉ INVESTIGUEN ANTES DE AFIRMAR TODO LO QUÉ SALEN DE SUS BOCAS.
@@CiudadanoPatriota Sorry, I can't translate.
Thank you for pointing out the difference. It is obviously a different person.
WHAT WAS UP WITH THE REPEATED AUDIENCE TRACK BEING PLAYED OVER AND OVER? THAT DIDN'T MAKE ANY SENSE..
Same as his comments, pointless 🤣🤣🤣
@@meechneek whatever stupid
@@wesleycook7687 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I've seen many of the Paul is dead videos and some of them were a little more authentic then this one. My personal belief is that it was never true and when the rumor was originally spread The Beatles as well as the record companies ate it up and it became a big money maker. Only an idiot would believe such crap in the first place
@@donnaschakel8843 exactly 👏👏👏👏👏
Rest in peace Paul
He’s still alive and well
@@garryleeks4848 "Sir Paul" (William) is alive, however JPM have been dead since late 1966.
@@garryleeks4848Yes, James Paul is alive, like George and John... however, not on earth at this time.
@@olskzeri1476
An MBE designation was awarded to the late James Paul McCartney...did that not elevate him, too, socially?
As you said there's only one original, surviving Beatle ,it was Ringo!
There seems to be a Faul but that doesn't mean he permanently replaced him. So without skipping a beat Paul 2 slides on in to replace Paul 1. He fits right in with the rest of the group and from '66 onward pens some of the Beatles greatest hits like Penny Lane, Get Back, Black Bird, Lady Madonna, Let it be, etc., then goes on to have a great solo career with Wings. What are the astronomical odds that A. they find a guy who looks and sings just like him, and B. has the talent to write so many great tunes after replacing by Paul 1... mind boggling.
Ridiculous. Young Paul has exactly the same teeth as older Paul, i mean EXACTLY.
Case closed.
Never heard of falsers no?.
Easy to fake
Impossible to fake, just like fingerprints
@@meechneek Bullshit. Teeth can be fake you know.
@@meechneek Worry more about his ears changing shape and his skull changing shape.
Its not Faul, because Faul can’t play without looking at his hands. Sorry to disapoint you!
It's very dodgey to think faul was on the scene long before Paul was killed x
Exactly.. I believe Paul was murdered
@@sanctifyme4543 it was the Tavistock institution that controlled them!
Well, I have three things to say. 1. He was never on stage, and 2. because he doesn't exist. 3. Paul was never killed.
@@rowdyyates4273yes, this goes further back than sixty six, Im sure.
billy, who replaced Paul was a session musician for many years before 66, and was classicly trained on piano from age three@@sanctifyme4543
Read the description... This is only a joke 😂
No. This is not Faul. He did not appear until late 1966. This is Paul.
да это Пол ! это его манера челюсть вперед выставлять у микрофона! как подбородком хочет что-то задеть.он так делал всегда. шоу СаллИван США 1964 .
Good body language skills! I've seen a 1965 Japan concert with Faul but can't locate it on Utube anymore. It was clearly Faul, for what it's worth I've been on this for 10 years and I know was Faul. Moved on to John vs Fohn these days, and Fohn did a lot of appearances!
They didn't play in Japan in 1965
Feorge and Fingo did too.
it's amazing how Paul both played better and wrote better after he "died" 🤷🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️
Yeah , Faul was a better musician . But in an interview from 1964 , John Haliday(aka Paul James McCartney) said he planned to retire “in a few years” and that’s exactly what went down. Brian Epstein had to go down with a drug overdose to influence the Beatles fans that now drugs was what all the STARS were using and doing . It was all a lie . Rex Makin took over all Brian Epstein’s assets and renamed them all Makin . Can’t make this stuff up!! But it’s all true. Look up Colin Unwin (the Original John Lennon) on YT . He has a channel with some great videos on it . I never fell for the lie way back when . I knew the whole band was changed and people still call me crazy. John Lennon looks nothing like John Lennon of 62 to 66. Colin Unwin does!! So does John Haliday as Paul. They’re best of friends and both worked at 20 Forthlin Rd. Not a coincidence!!
@@rusherman2112 lmao you actually believe all that don't you?
@@brianemanuel576 I indeed do. I’ll get you a link. RUclips takes it down quick . But if that don’t work. We’ll find a way
@@brianemanuel576 ruclips.net/video/ApBTNDKoX6c/видео.html
@@brianemanuel576 if you don’t see link . There’s a few great channels that break it all down very throughly. ruclips.net/video/ApBTNDKoX6c/видео.html
Unfortunately many people get mad when someone like me says Paul is replaced by Billy. I never felt connected with Billy .
Sadly that's so true. Those who don't want their bubble burst, lash out. Happens all the time, everywhere. People really don't like to think they've been fooled....
Don't care, Billy has done some really good music, thanks Mr, Shears@@logotrikes
What a load of crap.So not only do you need to find somebody who looks like Paul ,he also has to be left handed and sing /talk like him and it has to be kept secret for ever.😂
My point exactly there is no way they found a replacement so fast who was in fact a better songwriter and singer than Paul. And on top of that all the people who would have to keep it secret, someone would’ve been slipped up or admitted something 🤣
@@fleight9484 there are some lunatics out there and you won't convince them, they know better 🤷
@@fleight9484 they have. Many times. Faul himself tells us all the time that he is not Paul.
@@fleight9484 Does Faul have to scream it into your face that he isn't the real Paul? he literally said he joined the Beatles as an established band, real Paul cofound the Beatles. You're just too dismissive.
@@mikepaul145 don’t worry the naïve nature of my previous comment is in the past. It’s hard to argue with facts that the man is simply different. I can’t deny the Beatles we’re on some freemasonry type stuff. To much unexplained stuff happened in that 66/67 period.
I went to his live show,and as a Beatles fan from the begining,can tell that there isn't a way to be an inpersonator to Paul McCartney,
What you basing that on
@@peterf08 recaude there is no way hoy can have two guys with the same talent,same voice tone,left handed,able to play and sing at the same time and last but not least identical face,come on man.
@@peterf08 No, what YOU basing on? The truth is that Paul is alive until someone give a concret proof that he really died. YOU guys have to prove it, no us, it's like a christian asking for an atheist to prove that God isn't real, no, you guys believe in it, you guys have to prove.
@@kauadosreis3012 Thank you! I don't know why I keep watching this BS, a rabbit hole I wish I'd left alone. Its funny at first, but then pisses me off with how many people believe it, and how absurdly ridiculous the many theories go without a shred of evidence.
@@marshallhood9220 How is it funny? Approaching a serious subject in jest; will make the subject seem less serious. Watch Justice for James Paul McCartney. Plenty of people believe this because of the mountain of evidence. Your dismissal almost seems like wishful thinking. Simply asserting there isn't any evidence, doesn't destroy the evidence dummy. There's even pictures of Pauls' viscerally destroyed head and headless corpse.
Guessing the creator of this vid left school at about 15, such is the relationship between belief in conspiracies and lack of education.
read the description
Wrong. He discovered the truth. He probably has more schooling than most of us
@@JonahNelson7 I hope you're joining in on the satire and read the little description under the video
@@pemo2676 yeah I knew immediately the vid was a joke. I just can't help trolling along with the Faul thing
@@JonahNelson7 yeah, nah.
What hurts me is thinking that happy go lucky guy who hit it big died and wasn’t able to enjoy a long life of success. That really sucks. I hope it’s all lies but then why would so many people lie.
Exactly. It's sinister, and he was denied the recognition and send-off he deserved. And yes, for all the nay-sayers, why would so many people have their suspicions - many innocent suspicions - in that they knew as soon as looking at the Sgt. Pepper cover something was up.
@@jennytaylor3324 Twenty years ago I had a dream that Paul was sacrificed. He was just looking at me and I was horrified. I woke up in tremendous sadness then blew it off as just a dream. Until years later all of this information started coming out that I began to expect the worst. It’s as if a beautiful flower that excited us all with his innocent joy for life that was a part of our growing up now has blood on it.
@@itsgleneaton4883 Wow, that's interesting. It sounds like more of a vision than just a dream. And it pre-dates the time when ordinary people would have any notion of any of this, when far fewer of us had internet at home. A lot of people say in comments that he seemed like a sweet, genuine person. They weren't much more than boys when they signed up with those who would control them - which may well have led to P's sacrifice. How could they have fully realised what they were getting in to? And the hints dropped very publicly by Heather Mills about the time of the divorce have always bothered me. I wonder what she knew about Faul that would be "too devastating" if it came out?
@@jennytaylor3324 it’s horrible finding out about so many things that involved the lives of people and Paul is definitely one of them. But out of the few who commit these horrible crimes against humanity they are very few compared to the many like us who do care about the lives of others. I think in the end we will win. But fir now we’ll just keep on fighting.
@@itsgleneaton4883 True.
Laughing out loud! There never was a Faul, only Paul same as ever.
Your wrong sgt peppers tells it all if you think he grew a few inches and his feet got bigger and his eyes changed to hazel from brown in 1 year . Then so be it ,but that did happen
I'm going to see Paul (billy) McCartney tonite in fort Wayne Indiana I know he isnt Paul it's just a stage name now look into it Billy has been putting clues in his music with sgt peppers forward with wings and by himself he says it all the time that his is playing a part he is a clone etc band on the run listen to the lyrics look up Paul using latex I wish it wasnt true ,but it is. Everyday more info is coming out look up Paul having 6 toes on both feet but Paul from before 1966 has 5 toes it's been in our face but we were blind to the truth
@@jeremyb5468 No mate, YOU'RE WRONG. Paul us 100% alive and you need to get off the bloody peyote. Fuck PID. Macca lives!! 1942- still kickin' PID rumours' asses
@@jeremyb5468 You really believe that the "Fake"Paul was inches taller than the "real Paul" when all along that WAS Paul standing on a mound and that the shoe size difference is nothing but a hoax, and Paul has always worn the same size shoe?? You PID believers are quite stupid.
@@jeremyb5468 There is no "Billy", you stupid ass. Only Paul, the one and only.
And, if he's a fake, why are you paying money to see him? You must like the "fake's" music, since he's actually the real Paul McCartney. Case closed.
Fans of The Fabs have been seeing this footage for years. And the canned screams were completely unnecessary.
wow - thanks for putting this together! great work :)
How did you get access to this footage? It was supposed to be destroyed. Now everyone knows... 😔
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Very interesting, wonderful speaking for itself research.
How did You find out?
Mustn't be William Campbell/Shears
around 87 years old today?
He seems to be younger, doesn't he?
Rubbish from start to finish
Rubbish?? I think he’s correct . But was this his first gig?? As a 40+ year professional bassist I can tell you this is a different musician just from his playing . Billy Shears has admitted many times that he was brought into the Beatles as a organized affair. John Haliday is biological Paul . No doubt about it . Look him up. The whole band was replaced in 1966
Sgt Peppers Lonley Hearts Club band replaced and buried the old Beatles . Not just Paul was replaced. All 4 were !! Colin , John, Mark and Terry are the original Beatles and they were removed at a time when was necessary as they didn’t fit the status quo which was drugs sex and rock and roll. Rex Malkin replaced Brian Epstein. He didn’t die . Just a character change. Deception is all we get !!
@@rusherman2112 so we have gone from a simple McCartney's death (still crazy!) to all four Beatles were replaced! Well thanks for making me laugh mate! John Halliday could never have been Paul McCartney, you see Halliday is only 5-ft 7 inches tall and is 6 years younger than McCartney! Which means when McCartney was singing "love me do" in 1962 Halliday was sitting at his desk at school he was only 14!
@@rusherman2112 You think?? I would love it if it was. I can't say I'm too sure of it though.
McCartney also had sparkling eyes...
And
gave quick, slick,
full body wiggles🎉
Forensic Files has a new link on U Tube. Found it by accident. The thing is if you make a negative comment, you are deleted instantly. If she doesn't want anyone disagreeing with her she should be banned. It was 3 hours old and I was deleted. I came back later and the postings had disappeared. Something fishy here.
It’s funny how this Paul looks exactly like the original Paul, then the Paul we see today looking different. Something is not adding up.
Plus, this is from 1966 not 1965.
The pre '66 Paul looks so very different than the post '66 Paul!
He literally does not.
@@BasicLeigh Biden looks completely different yeah, but that does tend to happen when you age. Can’t tell me with a straight face you actually think an 82 year old is fake because he aged.
@@BasicLeigh Can you give me some concrete evidence that Paul is a fake?
@@BasicLeigh Musicians tend to change their style a lot over the course of their career. Paul is left handed, and while the cigarette theory seems like a hint, I think he just wanted it in the shot because the camera was to his right. And I don’t know where you found that they “hated” America.
@@BasicLeigh 😂 You honestly make me laugh. It’s not gaslighting it’s just basic knowledge.
Thats some good shit you are smoking., ( BTW George was laughing because Lennon cocked up the lyrics)
Oooohhh - yeahhh yeahhh...
I guess George was smoking the same stuff when he calls faul 'william' in the scorsese doc and his wife calls him 'billy' on the red carpet also when George also calls him 'faul' in the 80s interview all available on youtube. Memoirs of billy shears novel says it all narrated by George Martins son and no legal or copyright legal action taken. I buried Paul - end of strawberry fields. I could easily go on............ But they done a good job admittedly.
@@miracles4u sorry, Matthew. If you are talking about the 80s interview on Australian tv, there is a YT post out there where it's claimed George said "faul." In the actual interview he clearly says Paul.
@@miracles4u yes they were all on something. everyone. Every single human that had contact or knowledge of The Beatles since 1960. Everyone "IN" for whatever absurd reason ever given... what a gigantic load of crap for crying out loud 🤦♀️🤦♀️
@@stormduchess3128 Sorry storm. Not only has George greeted Faul as William, Ringo said "There's two left drag one is William". Can you explain Pauls' nose growing longer? or his entire fucking skull for that matter? Doubters are more annoying than those who mistake John Halliday as Paul. Paul died horribly.
I think this was Paul. Same nose, nostrils parallel to floor, unlike Billy's nose that sweeps up to the tip.
да это Пол ! это его манера челюсть вперед выставлять у микрофона! как подбородком хочет что-то задеть.
Lmao y’all slow af thinking he died. This concert was in 65 apparently Paul “died” in 66 so u missed that one
Here’s the thing Billy didn’t take over until 1966. Paul played all original concerts
Another thing. There are other videos of the Beatles playing live. They didn't have monitors, so they couldn't hear themselves. The amps were crappy, the joke wad they sounded like 10,000 transistor radios. So, George had to look at John to know when the song was over. And with the screaming girls, nobody could tell if they played well or not. As far as Paul having chubby cheeks, nobody looks the same as they did young. Think of Robert Downey Jr. He looks completely different now compared to now.
It wasn't just 'Faul', I think we were all shaking our heads during this nonsense!
What a bunch of crap, oh yea, I think I saw big foot in the crowd as well, can’t you guys see it, it’s so obvious...
PAUL is So BeAtleRific
Cheeky Loveable
With his Big
Hazel Eyes♥️♥️♥️♥️🎸🎸🎸🥁🥁
Dont forget cherub face
@Debra Donato ~ Paul had dark brown eyes
Read the memoirs of billy shears and you’ll know that this clip is of the real Paul.
I have the memoirs - where does it say that in the book?
@@mehitablestorm8877 memoirs talks about how it took Billy a little while to learn to play left handed. That being done in late 1966. Unless someone was behind the stage playing for him., which is possible.
That is a science fiction book, do you think the supposed Billy would uncover his lie as if nothing had happened?
@@HugoKaiju536 of course it fiction. It even states that it is. If you haven’t read it, then maybe you should. There is often more more truth in fiction then want to admit.
@@phailey100
Having musicians backstage playing in real time is very plausible.
Look to KISS concerts, where it happened frequently
If it isn't obvious by now, you just don't want to see it
I don’t understand you people
@clifford heywood omg your so dumb if you actually think that
What about all the make up artists over the yrs??They Did'nt discover the latex'no?Plausible or laughable'This is getting ridicolus.The most current story is they were all imposters...If so,I guess I'm more impressed than ever👍🏼
@stargazer not
"Faul" wrote some of the best songs in the history of pop music. Furthermore, his songs were better than Paul's. The Paul is dead theory is one of the stupidest conspiracy theories I know. If it is really true that Paul died in 65, then in an incredibly short time someone was found who was made to look like Paul using the surgery at the time without any visible scars. This person, "Faul," spoke in the same voice as Paul and looked so much like him that only a small community today is convinced it is not Paul. Videos and photos are meticulously compiled to prove the smallest alleged irregularities on the faces of Paul and “Faul”. This shows very clearly how incredibly good plastic surgery was back then ;). And ultimately, highly sensitive, intelligent people like John, Ringo and George performed and smiled on stage next to him. There was no trace of sadness, they obviously went through it cold. But they have hidden hundreds of hidden messages in their songs and album covers. This is all incredibly absurd.
Surgery of the time? Marlena Deiteich, Mae West, and Marlyin Monroe all had highly developed cosmetic surgery.
It wold be a miracle in itself to creat a NEW Paul...so then why don’t you guys create a New John and a New George to have all the Beatles again?..???
Yeah, no kidding. Fohn and Feorge...naive or idiots?
@@markhoover3743 I think Ringo's pretty much retired so they'll need to find a Fingo too!
@@nickhirst999 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤯
Yea,yea,yeah,ooo indeed😅!The height difference is obvious Billy being taller.Interesting footage.
paul was 5 foot 10.5 inches. Faul was listed as the same height and confirmed by you tube. Same guy.
Exactly that Japanese press conference first scene he's towering over all of them - gets word then brings chair down or removes cushion to Lower himself - it's so obvious Definitely not the original
keep taking the tablets mate.
Part 1: Paul. Mouth pallet, ears, eyes, nose, eyebrows and the love of one another.
You’re right, tho, he was very sick.
Part 2 & 3: yeah, he’s taller but he could have had higher heels bc it’s Paul. Keep in mind, allegedly, he was being slowly poisoned at that time as a form of torture
Paul looks so much different, I can’t believe they got away with it, what ever drugs you’re on please go easy on them, this video is absolutely ridiculous LOL!
Narrator was painful to listen to. You should be embarrassed to have this on the internet.
Checkout Gary Gibson Lennon impersonator
When you see just how much Gary looks like John especially a young John you will be blown away and to make matters worse Gary plays guitar as well then it will Dawn on you that Paul could have been replaced not all together but for the sake of filming, live performance etc
Why would they need to replace Paul? Celebrities die all the time. Do they replace them?
The amount of conspiracy freaks on here is astonishing.
That's Paul McCartney...what the hell is wrong with you..??
So they found a guy that looked like him, sang like him, played left handed like him, and he was a world class songwriter lol. Cause "Faul" would have written Sgt Peppers, She's Leaving Home, Hey Jude, Blackbird, Let It Be etc. Crazy nonsense.
There was no CGI in the mid-60s. And at this point if this were true- the guy’s been touring for 50 years, he’s damn good, why not just come out and admit it now?
That's what some PID's say.He does'nt admit it so he must be an imposter🙄
He has, read Billy’s Back or the memoirs of Billy Shears. See how you feel after reading it….
@@rebeccajelenawang4306 Some, not all, he practically has admitted it.
@@julesrox7538 I've read it. All it does is debunk about 80% of the PID theories.
And all these clowns talk.about "cgi", "latex fillimgs" endless !advanced cosmetic surgery seemingly forgetting this was the friggin' mid sixties! What is going on in their conniving little minds?!
Lol,I don't see anything different, they were just chilling out and having fun of themselves, I think their gears didn't work properly that night and most likely they also were a bit high on something ..
So this video just mocks the original James Paul McCartney because this is "canonically" pre-1966.
This theory is contradicting itself.
I'm seeing Billy in concert tonite my 1st time seeing the best Paul McCartney inpersonator ever. Your right bro
@Greg Hubbard your just brain washed it's ok maybe one day you will see the truth
So fuckin Jeremy, Nowhere Mam, why are you payin' serious quid to see a fake??? Why?? Because he's the genuine Paul you wanker!
@@jeremyb5468 Maybe one day you'll take your head out yer bummm
Faul came in the Beatles when circa sept,1966.
Billy present during revolver sessions......
“I bought A Mersey beat wig, but it was a size to big”
Look out there's a Monster Coming, Death cab for Cutie, both PID tunes
It's more than 10 minutes. There is no Beatles music. Convincing.
UNconvincing!! There's WELL KNOWN 'Live' sound-footage, which Lez$HIThead DELIBERATELY MISSED - oooooooooh!
@@tinapatton7346 Read the description before getting pressed
This is the real JPM
What will it take to stop people from publishing this embarrassing, nonsensical LIE?
A lawsuit by Paul McCartney. However he has responded to some of these comments. He thinks they are funny. Either that or when Paul really dies.
The truth.
People make money off this stuff so it will never stop.
@@wesleycook7687DIVERTIDOS ES CUANDO TE VEN LA CARA DE INCAUTO Y CREES TODO LO QUÉ TE MUESTRAN POR TV, ...INVESTIGA POR QUÉ AL BUEN MAL EVANS ROUDIES INCONDICIONAL DE THE BEATLES ESTUVO DESDE SUS COMIENZOS Y SOSPECHOSAMENTE MUERE ACRIBILLADO POR UN POLICÍA...EXTRAÑAMENTE UN POCO ANTES DE LANZAR SU LIBRO DE CONFIDENCIAS CUANDO ESTUVE CON THE BEATLES ...QUÉ ME DICES A ESO SABIONDO ? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 AAH, ESTOS SE LA CREEN TODO LO QUÉ LE QUIEREN QUÉ CREAN Y CAEN REDONDITOS.... INVESTIGUEN CARAMBA 😂😂😂
So they were able to find a musical genius in England that just happened to be the same age, look and sound identical to paul McCartney?🥴
He is not same age and looks different in many ways, you just blind.
completely absurd to think anyone could step in and do paul’s job!
I'm sure there are hundreds. Talent is cheap.
Read the comments above
@@mariaelisamalpartida3051 I've watched many other videos and listened to interviews of authors of books. It's no joke. There was at least 3 Pauls and possibly 2 Johns. You have a multimillion dollar band and you're gonna let it all go just because one dies?
@@mariaelisamalpartida3051 Look at Will Farrell and the Red Hot Chilli Peppers drummer. What are the odds 2 famous people look alike? Even greater odds a double of us is out there. Not that the 3 Pauls looked alike. Easy to tell them apart with the internet. Height alone. Head shape.
@@mariaelisamalpartida3051 I hear you but why is it no one is claiming Ringo is the original Ringo? Where there's smoke there's fire and where there's will there's a way. Not that this is the most important conspiracy in history, for every one conspiracy we hear about there's probably 10 others burried with the bodies.
Well spotted. There is an earlier appearance of yet another Faul with Dusty Springfield ( the one where she talks about his eyebrows). That Faul doesn’t sing though, just mimes. I think he was just put in for interviews and such. This Faul you are showing was the musician who sang (Billy), he was at both the Shea stadium performances, real Paul I don’t think ever appeared there.
hi, thanks, I just watched the Dusty vid. this looks more like CGI. They alter nearly all film of red Paul.
look at Pauls ears. It becomes easier to spot if you slow down the vid. They also make his nose longer
Real Paul has never appeard playing with The Beatles. They were all Fauls, right from the start. It All happened when Jim told him, he cannot go to Hamburg with lads cause he had to study. Then they found Billy Faul Cuntbell
@@meechneek really interesting theory.
How do you know that is true?
@@azurestarton how can it not be true????????? :-P
@@lezshed CGI? When wad this, please?
CGI in 1966? Someone is in bad need of some basic history lessons
This is footage from 65-66, that's been enhanced today by CGI. This footage was laying around for years because there was no reason to destroy it. This guy just happened to get a copy and enhanced it to keep the Paul is Dead myth going. Paul is very much alive. There is no big cover up. There is nothing to cover since even John Lennon said it was a joke started by an American DJ in late 66 and went viral, creating a series of books until 69. Now, in the 21st century it's back and the theories are even more bullcrap than in the 60s. It must be younger people pushing this old tired myth again . Most of us that were teens in the 60s dismissed it and went on with our lives.
This video is a joke.
OH MY GOD!! YOU PEOPLE ARE ABSOLUTELY INSANE!! I WAS LAUGHING SO HARD AT THIS UTTER NONSENSE!!
Stop with all this speculation. We're living in a time where all you have to do is get a DNA sample from him and find out if it's your beloved Billy. Just stop already!!
No, it's the Paul. He doesn't look at the neck when he plays, he bounces off the microphone as usual, he's of normal height, he has his normal hoarse voice. He's a little slow, but maybe he's just nervous or not feeling very well.
I have done a facial recognition project for school and could run any photos through it to settle this rubbish once and for all.
Which way¿?
Hilarious,from the comments I realize many Ppl simply don't get that this is just a joke on behalf of all the Ppl.who actually believe in the ridicolus theory.A woman is trying to prove(through facial recogn.)That Paul is an imposter(Billy)Fair enough,but last time I checked,she claimed there were about 12 Pauls & The Beatles were just a Travistick invention.(Fabricated 4)When Ppl.go on about latex,& Phil Stanshill etc.I keep asking myself if Internet is a blessing or a curse...🤔🤐☺️
Interesting that all we can hear is you talking. Paul is Paul. I am finished watching this garbage. Wig , my behind!! LIES!!!!!
You guys think George, John and Ringo will let a nobody lead the band?
🤣
It's the same chubby face through the entire video.
Here's a tip.
The real Paul played with a pick because he was a converted guitarist who took up the bass when Stu Sutcliffe, who was an awful bass player, left the band.
Sometimes Paul looks at his hands and sometimes he does not. Check out playing Don't Let Me Down. He's not looking at his hands...
Were there Beatles look a likes? Perhaps. They have them now. Go to Vegas and you'll see a whole bunch of Left handed Paul look a likes....
"Faul" played with a pick too. Take a look at the rooftop concert footage.